I also noticed that the AI specifically ignored your question about the Abraham Accords, instead listing achievements that occurred after the so-called deadline of January 31, except for one from President Trump's first term, but it was questioning the effectiveness of the Kosovo-Serbia cease fire.
Then you did later nail down the AI regarding 'process' vs. 'results' double standards regarding Trump and the current recipient.
Open-ended questions will result in the AI producing a wide swath of output. That output has an inherent bias because it is sourced by predominantly left-wing media and academic content. That's why the follow-up questions must target specific points rather than generalized frustrations, so that the AI can validate its sources and correct its interpretations.
A good AI will take that learning from the challenged follow-up and reassess its prior analysis, and not just correct that one point and move on.
It may seem to be bloat to start with such simple questions that we already know the answers to, but it establishes the baseline for the rest of the conversation. It's easier for me to to dispute content that the AI already provided, so I have to isolate on a single conclusion and point out its mistake. This is much more productive than asking a loaded question that causes the AI to ignore parts of it and focus on the fact that is in dispute.
The goal is for me to get the AI to produce as much correct content as possible with the fewest interactions on my part.
-PJ