To: adorno
How did this guy and his team pull off this stunt? Hundreds of feet under near freezing water is no small obstacle.
9 posted on
10/09/2025 8:50:45 AM PDT by
Thommas
(The snout of the camel is already under the tent.)
To: Thommas
He didn’t, the US did it.
12 posted on
10/09/2025 8:55:56 AM PDT by
packrat35
(“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
To: Thommas
How did this guy and his team pull off this stunt? Hundreds of feet under near freezing water is no small obstacle.
How was the pipeline built in the first place? After all, the construction was done hundreds of feet under water, in near freezing conditions. ;)
16 posted on
10/09/2025 9:21:17 AM PDT by
adorno
( )
To: Thommas
The actual dive was probably not the most difficult problem to overcome. There are lots of so-called technical divers in the Baltic who dive much deeper than the 260 ft needed to reach the pipe-line. They use electronically controlled rebreathers, and there are quite a few different marks available for the private/civilian diver.
The main difference between a professional dive operation and what the Ukrainians are supposed to have done is the safety measures. Good tech-divers usually make sure they either carry emergency gas bottles with them or hang them at various depths. However, the professional diver is usually connected to the surface or to a diving bell close to his working site. That would not have been possible for the divers in this operation.
I think the most difficult part of the operation would have been to find the pipe-line, and to find a good site to place the explosives. Also, of course to build and to handle the explosive device.
22 posted on
10/09/2025 11:02:08 AM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson