*** H/T to WildHighlander57 ***
Just a day after being warned by JimRob himself
to leave this thread, This troll decided to ignore
the warning and keep doing what he does best...
Trolling.
*** click the name to check ***
Posted on 09/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
Guess I’ll just pick it up here tomorrow and read forward… nite all! 🇺🇸
LOL 😂😆
I was hoping for a big week next week, but the shutdown has halted Comer's House Oversight Committee regarding Epstein. I recall a post on the prior thread from an X.com saying that Congress critters didn't want to be asked about the hearings.
I see Chuck Grassley's Judicial Committee Oversight Hearing was deemed to important to cancel. The topics look interesting - wish I could be a fly on the wall. But then, major trials involving these topics have already taken place. If there are more Grand Juries going on now, they won't tell us.
Source: Senate Judiciary Committee: Grassley Opens DOJ Oversight Hearing and CNN Politics: Bondi Hearing Coverage (October 7, 2025).
That was a well deserved zot.
For all hm’s kvetching, he could have just stayed off the Q threads and ignored them. FR hasn’t been ruined by them. You have to deliberately search out Q threads. There’s the whole rest of the forum to find stuff to read and comment on if you don’t like or believe Q.
However, FR has been ruined by the likes of trolls like hm infesting and infecting FR.
IATZ and good riddance.
I asked GROK to provide a list of the attendees at Trump's 2025 inauguration because I want to know who else is captured/controlled. The list holds a few clues, but there is no exhaustive list, and if James Comey attended, it would certainly turn heads.But I see that Nancy Pelosi attended! I am gonna have a GREAT NIGHT's sleep! There is no way she would willingly attend the inauguration of the man she said was 'Detatched from reality' and "....killing Americans." Dan Quayle and his wife attended. Mike Pence and Mitch McConnel were there. A big group of people I can't imagine would attend unless they were captured/convicted of crimes like, for example, President Trump's EO.
I was glad to also see the names of patriots like Lee Greenwood and happier still that there were no Ukrainian guests on the list. Five German AfD politicians attended. Well, I found pouring over the list interesting. I'll put an excerpted list below and I've posted the full list in Festival.
- Donald Trump (U.S. President, host)
- Melania Trump (First Lady)
- JD Vance (Vice President)
- Usha Vance (Second Lady)
- Joe Biden (Outgoing U.S. President)
- Jill Biden (Outgoing First Lady)
- Barack Obama (Former U.S. President)
- Bill Clinton (Former U.S. President)
- George W. Bush (Former U.S. President)
- Kamala Harris (Outgoing U.S. Vice President)
- Giorgia Meloni (Prime Minister of Italy)
- Javier Milei (President of Argentina)
- Nayib Bukele (President of El Salvador)
- Boris Johnson (Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom)
- Elon Musk (CEO of Tesla/SpaceX, world's richest person)
- Jeff Bezos (Founder/Executive Chairman of Amazon)
- Hillary Clinton (Former U.S. Secretary of State, First Lady)
- Mark Zuckerberg (CEO of Meta)
- Laura Bush (Former U.S. First Lady)
- Tim Cook (CEO of Apple)
- Sundar Pichai (CEO of Alphabet/Google)
- Bernard Arnault (CEO of LVMH, world's second-richest)
- Rupert Murdoch (Media proprietor, Fox Corp.)
- Mike Pence (Former U.S. Vice President)
- Mitch McConnell (Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader)
- Doug Emhoff (Outgoing Second Gentleman)
- Dan Quayle (Former U.S. Vice President)
- Newt Gingrich (Former U.S. House Speaker)
- Kevin McCarthy (Former U.S. House Speaker)
- John Boehner (Former U.S. House Speaker)
- Han Zheng (Vice President of China)
- Nigel Farage (Leader of Reform UK)
- Liz Truss (Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom)
- Marilyn Quayle (Former Second Lady)
- Conor McGregor (MMA fighter/entrepreneur)
- Joe Rogan (Podcaster/comedian)
- Dana White (UFC President)
- Carrie Underwood (Country singer, performer)
- Kid Rock (Musician, performer)
- Wayne Gretzky (Hockey legend)
- Mike Tyson (Boxing legend)
- Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI)
- Shou Zi Chew (CEO of TikTok)
https://freerepublic.com/~heavymetal/
This account has been banned or suspended.
Okay
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/01/2025 Vol.512, Q Day 2896, Keflavik76 wrote: Seems like a nice place for this: 🚨BREAKING - Hillary Clinton praises & congratulates Donald Trump for achieving a peace deal between Israel & Hamas -- Aquila
THIS is suitable for framing. What would history books make of this years from now? He publicly told her she'd be in jail if he were president, but she praises him!
....Pigs Fly and CIRCLE THE AIRPORT. News, at 11:00...
I love the smell of burnt troll in the morning.
Just like the good ‘ol days!
Please add me to the ZOT ping list. Thank you!
Added ;^)
I'm a fan of logic. If something is logical I'm usually supportive of it. Logic can be applied to both politics and sports.There seems to be little difference.
In your piece below the question is whether or not Hamas is losing in the hostage deal.
The writer from the far left NYT suggests that Hamas will lose their leverage once they give up the hostages. For me the entire deal is already questionable since Hamas is giving up 47 hostages many of which are "dead" in exchange for 735 terrorists. Israel has been feeding and clothing the terrorists for months and some are the worst on the face of the earth.
To me Hamas is winning in this deal. If you get back 735 and give up 47 some dead you won they lost. I must have missed something.As far as leverage goes how long would it take hamas to get 47 more hostages if they really wanted them? A week,two weeks? What am I missing?
In football if your team is losing by 7 points and it's early in the 4th quarter you play it safe. The other option was trying to run up the middle. That's a low percentage call on fourth down and two at mid-field. Especially, when you have won 2 games and lost 3 and are trying to salvage the season playing the number 5 team in the country which is undefeated.
You don't run up the middle, get stopped for a loss, and then lose the game.That to me was not logical. But, I fish and only played football in the street when I was a kid.
Communism is rule by threat. If you are the communists in a country you have far more guns pointed at your citizens than they have and you rule.
There is a problem however. In order to pay for communism you must embrace that which you hate:capitalism. And,you better be good at it or you won't earn enough money to pay for your goals. The problem with communism is it takes capitalism to pay for it.
Along comes China that decides they have destroyed their country through communism so they need to take over another country. They can move the chosen commies into the new country and leave the rest to fend for themselves.
Along comes dictator chi who says why take only one country when we can rule the world. The problem is to rule the world they don't have enough guns or people to rule by the force of the gun. They will have to do it using capitalism. Not pure capitalism but "predatory capitalism" their style,in a do or die fashion.
The US is the prize. So chi tells us we can't have any more rare earth and that goes for those the chicoms they sell to as well. If any of them sell to the US they are in big trouble as well.
Trump says OK we can play that game. How bout a 100% tariff on everything you would like to sell to us? Problem is now the commies in hiding in the democrat party say we are the problem not the Chinese since they are commies in hiding.
So back to the problem of logic,who is being logical here.Are the chicoms being logical for wanting to take over the world and saying we can't buy rare earth that we need big time? Or, is Trump being logical for countering what they do.?
IMHO, it was fourth down and two to go for a first down.Trump decided to kick rather than run up the middle,we will win this one.
The question is always what call to make:
Gators in a huddle:
Posts 2727 and 28 gotta ask why?
1700 traded for 47 many dead?I just dont get it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpGA-8t-1pE
Excellent explanation of what happens after the bio-weapon shot enters the body.Totally scary at best.
If you followed HM's posting habits, you would have noticed that it didn't require a response to post. It was a propagandist troll spewing whether he was answered or not. He even defied the boss's call to leave. I noticed that the when he was dealt with, is wasn't by 'ignoring' him. Ignore never fixes anything and @ its root the reason there is Q is because America had been ignoring what had been going on for so long and had lost its way.
Beautiful
Exactly my point. He was taking over the whole thread. I decided it was too overwhelming for us to deal with.. he would have to be removed from the thread by authority. Also he was just reposting the same stuff over and over - it wouldn't matter if any of us responded or not. He had seized and taken over the thread. Any response from us was just encouragement to double his effort.
People familiar with his pattern told us to expect him back. I imagine JimRob needs to block him from posting at all - and he might still come back under a new registration. One suspects mental illness.
we have been through this once or twice before... unhappily. 😒
❤️
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
