Posted on 09/30/2025 1:48:18 AM PDT by Libloather
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
If I'm not mistaken, the first amendment says nothing about required clothing items.
She thought it was an art class.
She thought it was an art class.
“...I’m a 50-year-old woman...”
I will second that...
“...I’m a 50-year-old woman...”
I will second that...
“...I’m a 50-year-old woman...”
I will second that...
😅
𝘐𝘧 𝘐’𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴.
No, no, it says that can petition the government for 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 not 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴.
Well, I am certainly thankful that she wasn’t protesting extra-marital sex, else she might have started engaging in ...
Ouch! My poor mind’s eyeball.
Not as bad as you would think.
She looks really good for her age, actually.
Photos Please?
Guilty/Not guilty determination required.
“Guilty/Not guilty determination required.”
TTIWWP. I’m thinking whoever is going to post the picture, needs to have an eye wash picture just in case.
Guilty/Not guilty determination required.
Beth Bourne
I reckon Bourne was just demonstrating that if men can disrobe in women's or girl's locker rooms , she could do so at a school board meeting.
She made a very good point....er maybe two !
Wearing a bikini is not stripped down.
Boys should not be in girls locker rooms.
Let Beth do what she wants.
A. She’s today’s version of the “Harper Valley PTA”.
B. Her child who is a student at that school may be refusing to come out of her bedroom right now, so mortified and embarrassed at what her “Crazy Mother” just did. She’ll get over it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.