A judge must recuse themselves from a case if there is a conflict of interest, which includes any situation where their impartiality could reasonably be questioned, even if it’s just an appearance of bias rather than actual bias. The legal standard focuses on whether a reasonable person might doubt the judge’s ability to be fair. This process ensures fairness, maintains public confidence, and upholds the integrity of the judiciary, with federal and state laws often outlining specific grounds for disqualification
Thank you. Should we expect this be followed to the letter or twisted and ignored to suit partisan leanings in these times? What is the recent history of this concept in actual action?
Well, he could have refused as soon as he was assigned. But he didnt.
“A judge must recuse themselves from a case if there is a conflict of interest”
What person or board enforces that? I’ve heard that he can be encouraged to recuse, but he can refuse.
This must be a Federal case. I think POTUS can fire a Federal judge...?