Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/25/2025 5:29:18 PM PDT by MtnClimber
A few recent events allow us to connect the dots and figure out what Democrats are really out to do.
I want to connect some dots regarding the lawfare President Trump is encountering.
The first dot is all the radicals nominated and confirmed over Republican objections, especially in 2024.
The next dot is a statement from Senator Schumer after the election, saying the quiet part out loud. They knowingly put rogue and activist judges at all levels of the federal court system as an insurance policy against a potential President Trump comeback. This affirmed what many suspected about Democrat plans. Confirming radical activist judges was part of the plan to continue the chaos, and if DJT won, they would create roadblocks to his agenda.
The next dot is a statement that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson made regarding using her opinions to tell people how she “feels.” Conservatives rightly recoiled at the thought of a federal judge feeling emboldened to use the power of her legal opinion to tell people how she “feels” about a matter before the Court. Is that really her job? I thought judges interpreted the law. But I guess you can call me old-fashioned.
The next dot is Justice Jackson opining on SCOTUS issuing rulings for President Trump. She is “feeling,” or whining, that SCOTUS is favoring President Trump and is hearing too many emergency docket cases. I think her “feelings” are not designed for regular folks. I think her feelings are designed to encourage the resistance of these federal judges to President Trump’s agenda. If President Trump continues to receive and win these fast tracks, then the plans for resistance are being overwhelmed. If SCOTUS continues allowing the emergency docket, this will undermine the plan!!
It is my humble opinion that these events are all connected.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The leftist beliefs are unconstitutional. The Supreme Court contortions shine a spot light on it.
We all know that there are Legal, scientific, rules and standards.... but no "feelings". This is why it is so dangerous in an argument. There is no definition of feelings, is up to what an individual determines it to be. So there is no arguing about a feeling, there is no way to prove a feeling, there there's no way to win.
So I have chosen to also adopt the strategy of "feelings" when I'm dealing with liberals. I figured that turnaround is Fairplay.
The big question for me is assuming that his theory is correct, which I do, what are the legal steps available to stop it?
I think I will adopt that strategy too.
Jackson would not be on the Court if (1) Biden had not stolen the election in 2020 or (2) if he had picked the best available Democrat lawyer for the vacancy rather than arbitrarily limiting himself to 2% of the pool.
Comey this week. Hillary, at long last, next month?
Is this really the writer's name on a well known bourbon? "Maker S. Mark"
Between Harris for VP pick and Jackson as a SCOTUS appointment demonstrates why affirmative action DEI hires by Biden will forever...never mind he's just as dumb.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.