Posted on 09/22/2025 2:57:46 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
The head of Iran's atomic energy organisation, Mohammad Eslami, has arrived in Moscow for talks, Russia's state-run RIA news agency quoted the Iranian embassy as saying on Monday.
The 15-member UN Security Council earlier opted not to permanently lift sanctions on Tehran, after three European countries launched a 30-day process last month to reimpose them, accusing Tehran of failing to abide by a 2015 deal with world powers aimed at preventing it from developing a nuclear weapon.
Iran denies having any such intention, and Russia says it supports Tehran's right to peaceful nuclear energy.
Eslami is also Iran's vice president. RIA did not say whom he would meet in Moscow.
(Excerpt) Read more at trtworld.com ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
“Iran denies having any such intention”
Are we not entitled to judge, from the nature and function of their engineering facilities, their intentions?
If everywhere else in the known universe such facilities are 100% associated with nuclear weapons development, why should we believe the Iranian theocracy when they claim otherwise?
That’s Obama-Biden Era lunacy. Trump is right to act accordingly.
Now that Trump has re-established direct and reasonably cordial communications with Putin, he should call him and ask: Vlad—are you that stupid, or, how stupid do you think I am?
Putin will probably laugh and say something like: Don, we haven’t got many friends these days. Can you just let me slide on this one?
Desperate people in Russia might very well trade lethal technology that they aren’t and can’t use in their war for something they can use. The Russians have such technology in useless abundance, and the Iranians have the more usable technology in the thousands.
So far, most parties with access to civilization destroying technology have acted in their own long-term interest. But looking at desperate situations, like the impending fall of Berlin at the end of WWII, does anyone think the Germans wouldn’t have used whatever they could have gotten regardless of its civilization ending potential? There is only one think that’s important to a dying dictator and it’s not the health and welfare of future generations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.