Personally, I’d like to see the definition of “minor” changed to be “under the age of 13”. If you don’t know the difference between right and wrong by that age, you are what they call, “that boy’s not right in the head”.
What a fruit cake judge. If only we could hold hands and sing Kumbaya.
He dint mean to shoot him ‘shoot him’. Right woopee?
The guy is in college and he was tried as a juvenile? What????
He's in college and he's too immature to be totally responsible for his (evil) actions?
Why do so many judges making bad decisions have hard to pronounce foreign names ?
Are they here on J1B visas ?
Are there just no Americans who want to work as judges ?
are they all graduates of the Soros school of justice ?
In D.C., young criminals under age 24 (!!) can be tried as juveniles.
That there are no photos or name of the suspect tells me the system of justice in California for minors is skewed. The justification is towards a possibility of rehabilitation. I question if there is any rehabilitation in California prisons.
I think if one is 17-years-old, the rules should apply to more as crimes of an adult when it nears the 18th year. This suspect x has been charged with attempted murder with enhancing allegations of intentional discharge of a firearm and personal use of a firearm, assault with a semiautomatic firearm, and attempted second degree robbery. The level of criminal actions should have pushed him over to adult status.
The weapon was discharged several times during the struggle with Pearsall who fought to recover his goods. Stray bullets went everywhere until the gun jammed. This “kid” was determined to kill Pearsall in order to keep his booty. That hardened behavior should have been considered.
I must have missed it ... how old was this “juvenile”? Apparently old enough to procure a gun and then shoot some one. He will probably become a good instructor for those juveniles he will share room and board with.