Posted on 09/19/2025 3:02:24 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Personally, I’d like to see the definition of “minor” changed to be “under the age of 13”. If you don’t know the difference between right and wrong by that age, you are what they call, “that boy’s not right in the head”.
What a fruit cake judge. If only we could hold hands and sing Kumbaya.
Here in Minneapolistan the gangs use young kids to do the dirty work knowing they will never be prosecuted. I’m sure it’s the same everywhere.
Also, in this crime ridden schiffhole the county attorney says she won’t prosecute anyone that was busted for a felony due to a minor traffic stop.
http://www.fox9.com/news/hennepin-county-law-enforcement-traffic-stop-policy
He dint mean to shoot him ‘shoot him’. Right woopee?
The guy is in college and he was tried as a juvenile? What????
He's in college and he's too immature to be totally responsible for his (evil) actions?
Why do so many judges making bad decisions have hard to pronounce foreign names ?
Are they here on J1B visas ?
Are there just no Americans who want to work as judges ?
are they all graduates of the Soros school of justice ?
My 37 yo daughter moved there in 2021. She lives in Maple Grove now but was living by Loring Park & the Basilica, which was a little scary for me. She’s a total lefty so we don’t talk politics or religion anymore, but she seems happy. I pray she never has a reason not to be.
“””but was living by Loring Park & the Basilica”””
Not such a great place anymore. My wife is as conservative as can be but her sister who lives nearby is a lefty.
The old “nature/nurture” debate or something.
In D.C., young criminals under age 24 (!!) can be tried as juveniles.
Irregardless of age anyone committing a felony with a firearm, he is prepared to kill, should be treated as an adult.
That there are no photos or name of the suspect tells me the system of justice in California for minors is skewed. The justification is towards a possibility of rehabilitation. I question if there is any rehabilitation in California prisons.
I think if one is 17-years-old, the rules should apply to more as crimes of an adult when it nears the 18th year. This suspect x has been charged with attempted murder with enhancing allegations of intentional discharge of a firearm and personal use of a firearm, assault with a semiautomatic firearm, and attempted second degree robbery. The level of criminal actions should have pushed him over to adult status.
The weapon was discharged several times during the struggle with Pearsall who fought to recover his goods. Stray bullets went everywhere until the gun jammed. This “kid” was determined to kill Pearsall in order to keep his booty. That hardened behavior should have been considered.
As I said, I’m not sure the law actually allowed another decision.
24?
I don’t think they can show a picture of a minor criminal suspect. He was a minor when this happened.
I must have missed it ... how old was this “juvenile”? Apparently old enough to procure a gun and then shoot some one. He will probably become a good instructor for those juveniles he will share room and board with.
He was 17 at the time of the crime.
I don’t think he was in college at the time of the crime, because that college is in San Francisco, he lived in Stockton. Tgat would be a horrendous commute. The lawyer probably told him to do that, because it looked good.
Judge Denise de Bellefeuille. Another foreign meatball?
That came up earlier this week when Mayor Bowser was being questioned by a House subcommittee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.