[mund1011]

However, how would killing Kirk, making him a martyr, advance Communist goals?

++++++++++

I suppose the commies may have calculated that taking out Kirk was synonymous with taking out the TPUSA movement. Make no mistake, taking out CK was a big win for these vermin. He was the future and they could not risk that. Charlie was too much of a threat to their power. He could not be allowed to live. That’s my take.

[Wallace T.]

Charlie Kirk was good at persuading young people to his viewpoint, better than other conservative or alt-right speakers. However, no one is indispensable. When Rush Limbaugh died, a great voice was lost, yet conservatism did not evaporate. He was irreplaceable but the void was filled by podcasters and bloggers, many of whom were far more anti-establishment and conspiracy oriented than Rush ever was. Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, and Alex Jones come to mind. All three are Gen. X, the generation that followed the Boomer generation, to which Limbaugh belonged.

Charlie Kirk was a moderate when compared to Laura Loomer, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, or other alt-right influencers. Kirk's assassination may have the effect of increasing militancy, pushing conservatives into the alt-right camp. If the Trump Administration wants to stem this tendency, there must be a serious crackdown on these Antifa elements, not just Robinson's immediate circle, plus real prosecutions of the abuses of the Biden and Obama Administrations. Going after criminals and illegals in crime ridden blue cities is good but priority must be given to suppression of domestic communist terrorists and prosecution of the Deep State abusers of power, up to the levels of the Bidens, the Clintons, and Obama.