Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: proxy_user

They can for non-protected speech.

Inciting violence is not protected.


7 posted on 09/16/2025 2:39:54 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda estAnd )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster

According to the Supreme Court, generalized calls for armed struggle are permissible.

Maybe they will change their minds?


14 posted on 09/16/2025 2:45:21 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster
Inciting violence is not protected.

Correct. But how about laughing at it? Gloating over it? Specifically, should the government crack down on/jail/fine anybody who laughs at someone on the receiving end of violence?

Business can, and should, hire or fire at will, but I'm talking specifically about the role of government.

22 posted on 09/16/2025 3:04:45 PM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster

That’s right.


50 posted on 09/16/2025 6:17:15 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson