“allegedly sharing opinions on social media about the killing”
How can it be “alleged” if it’s right there on the internet?
Not only is it NOT “alleged,” the euphemistic “sharing opinions” is par for the course for these evil propagandists.
Celebrating the murder of a fellow human being may be “free speech” but should be identified for what it is.
Yahoo is currently running one of the most misleading headlines I’ve seen in awhile (which is saying something for them): “Unusual bullet messages deepen mystery around Charlie Kirk’s suspected killer.”
Inscribing the words “farm” or “light” on a bullet, for instance, would be unusual. Inscribing “Hey fascist! CATCH!” might only be described as a deep mystery to someone with a 5th grade education.
It is paired, of course, with a picture of some law enforcement officers casually standing and chatting in a completely disconnected environment. The reader wouldn’t be drawn to read in the same way that, say, a picture of saint George Floyd would be used for a similar story.