[CFW]

"This is exactly what I’ve been saying ever since I saw that video of the guy jumping off the building. He has no gun with him. Is the rifle in the woods a red herring that was left before the event even started?"

----

That's the same question I've been asking. I don't think the gun in the woods is the gun that was used. I believe ANTIFA has been planning this for a while and may have used that gun to misdirect the police.

By the way, Andy Ngo posted this a few hours ago:

@MrAndyNgo

· 6h

We don't yet know what the trans and Antifa engravings are on the rifle cartridges believed to have been used with the gun to assassinate Charlie Kirk, but if they are a "series of arrows," as CNN reports, it may be Antifa's signature "Iron Front" logo, or the trans symbol, or something else.

The three-arrow symbol serves as a dog whistle in graffiti, banners, and social media posts, indicating that the person who displays it is part of Antifa or supports its violent goals."

[Right_Wing_Madman]

I don't think the gun in the woods is the gun that was used.

If the gunman intends to leave the weapon behind, why leave it in the woods? Why did he disassemble the rifle, carry the rifle while he fled, run to the woods, re-attach the barrel, and leave it there? He would have just left it on the roof. It doesn't make any sense. There's so much more here.