Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watching The End Game Of New York's Climate Madness Begin To Play Out
Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 8 Sep, 2025 | Francis Menton

Posted on 09/10/2025 5:35:06 AM PDT by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2025 5:35:06 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Mamdani is coming along at just the time where he could do the most damage to NYC.


2 posted on 09/10/2025 5:35:19 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

3 posted on 09/10/2025 5:42:07 AM PDT by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

BTTT


4 posted on 09/10/2025 5:42:49 AM PDT by nopardons ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

You have to be an idiot to live in Commie NY.


5 posted on 09/10/2025 5:45:43 AM PDT by cp124 (Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Other states with morons in charge

2040
Oregon: Greenhouse gas emissions reduced 100 percent below baseline emissions.
2045
California: Net-zero target by 2045 and 100% renewable energy by 2045.
Hawaii: Net-zero target by 2045.
New Mexico: 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045.
2050
Colorado: Net-zero emissions by 2050.
Louisiana: Net-zero target by 2050.
Maine: Net-zero target by 2050.
North Carolina: Carbon neutrality in the electricity sector by 2050.
Other States with Goals
Illinois: Passed laws for 100% carbon-free electricity.
Massachusetts: Passed laws for 100% carbon-free electricity.
New York: 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040.
Rhode Island: Passed laws for 100% carbon-free electricity.
Washington: Passed laws to implement climate and clean energy goals, taking steps toward net-zero.


6 posted on 09/10/2025 5:46:08 AM PDT by Fzob (“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fzob

Missed my state MD

Maryland aims to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions statewide by 2045, as mandated by the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022. This ambitious goal includes an interim target of a 60% reduction in emissions from 2006 levels by 2031. To meet these targets, Maryland is implementing policies such as a Building Energy Performance Standard for large buildings to achieve net-zero by 2040, promoting electric vehicles, and transitioning state-owned buildings to all-electric new construction.


7 posted on 09/10/2025 5:47:54 AM PDT by Fzob (“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
..."‘no, we’re not going to approve pipelines we’ve already rejected on endless environmental grounds,’”

Endless environmental grounds?

How's those wind turbines and solar farms working out for you all?

8 posted on 09/10/2025 6:00:27 AM PDT by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

In NY, the Democrats are invincible. Any and all failures will be blamed on the mere existence of conservatives.


9 posted on 09/10/2025 6:06:46 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tommy Revolts
How's those wind turbines and solar farms working out for you all?

Trump cut money for a project here in Virginia

Trump admin cancels $39M meant for Norfolk’s Fairwinds Landing because of wind energy association

This is a green energy boondoggle, it’s a shame that it has progressed as far as it has.

10 posted on 09/10/2025 6:13:15 AM PDT by OldHarbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Lots of brain-dead in NY


11 posted on 09/10/2025 6:22:48 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Fake solutions to a fake problem so they can get more grift, all while they fake hate on the rich.


12 posted on 09/10/2025 6:32:43 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cp124

It is not just NY. Here in NH they proposed a 3’ diameter NG pipeline that would start in PA, go through NY, MA, NH and then back into MA.
In NH it would travel along an existing ROW that a 1’ diameter NG pipeline already traverses.

However, the fear mongering NIMBY took over. It got voted down in every town referendum. Somewhat because we in NH do not need the NG. It was primarily going to benefit MA, RI & CT where they have shut down nuclear plants. Although now we use primarily NG and nuclear(Seabrook) here in NH to generate electricity.

The problem is there are only two main NG pipelines coming into NH. One down through ME from Canada. The other comes up from MA. The issue is that a lot of NG comes into the port of Boston as LNG. Which means it travels from TX(or other US origins) on US flagged LNG tanker ships. Which have to abide by the Jones Act. Which primarily means they pay the crews more. Most are union ship crews.

It also means that when the demand for LNG went up in Europe due to the Ukraine war that affected the price for LNG delivered Boston too. That then increased the price that Eversource(the main New England electric utility) wanted for a KHW of electricity delivered to their customers.

I am locked in a contract with a secondary supplier of electricity. However, there were many people around here complaining on the local Facebook page that their bills had DOUBLED. I immediately asked those complainers whether they had been in favor of the Kinder Morgan proposed natural gas pipeline OR they have been against it? Most of them never responded. Which means they were against it. Or they did not understand that the pipeline would have lowered their electricity bills. That is because they have absolutely no idea HOW their electricity is generated. It just magically comes out of the wall socket.


13 posted on 09/10/2025 6:33:46 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Another part of NY’s energy problem: a hostility to nuclear power that is just now beginning to recede. The state even tore-down a newly completed nuclear power plant.


14 posted on 09/10/2025 6:35:44 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

The cost of a US crew is TEENY TINY microscopic compared to the value of the cargo. For cripes sake maybe we should outlaw US labor.


15 posted on 09/10/2025 6:37:53 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Then WHY is the cost to use US flagged vessels so much more?
The insurance?
The benefits?
The health insurance?

Why are ALL cruise ships flagged in Liberia? or other foreign countries?

The US law states that ANY vessel moving cargo from one US port to another US port has to follow the rules of the Jones Act. What makes the movement of that cargo so much more expensive?


16 posted on 09/10/2025 6:43:43 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

If Canada goes ‘green’, much of NY will go dark.


17 posted on 09/10/2025 6:50:24 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963
Or they did not understand that the pipeline would have lowered their electricity bills. That is because they have absolutely no idea HOW their electricity is generated. It just magically comes out of the wall socket.

Therein lies the rub. Not just with so-called "green energy" but virtually every other cause the Dims push. It's easy to demand that "somebody do something", as long as it's always somebody else having to do it. A leftist voter's worldview is easy for her to justify in her mind because she doesn't demand of herself that she be the one to figure out the impossible solution to her nonexistent problem.

Or another way to say it: there's talkers and then there's doers. Talkers are great at patting themselves on the back for fussing at doers not doing enough. That's all it takes for talkers to be satisfied. That's why fake causes are popular among the left.

Us conservatives tend to gravitate to being doers. That's one reason we're against impossible "solutions" to non-existent problems that wind up doing way more harm than the imagined good. That's also why we, as individuals, are more apt to take matters into our own hands to fix problems.

Exhibit A: My fussing about sky high energy prices due to the Dims' global warmageddon cult energy policies motivated me to research if it'd be feasible to be more energy self-reliant (My home is now more energy efficient, also has solar, and the car we had to replace anyway was replaced with an EV which we usually can provide the power for to charge it.) I know people who believe in the global warming doomsday cult stuff, but not one of them actually acts on it. Because they're not doers, they're talkers.

18 posted on 09/10/2025 7:02:36 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

The MOST liberals ever seem to DO is put up a sign in front of their house virtue signaling they are for this cause.

For example, the woman down the road with a Yellow and Blue “I stand with Ukraine” sign.
Other than going on line and buying the sign from Amazon what has she done?
Maybe she even got suckered into donating money.
It made her FEEL good about herself after. Putin is a bad guy.

Back in the 1980s the John Sununu(they called him SuNUKEnu) NH government and Public Service of NH proposed building the Nuclear plant at Seabrook, NH. It was protested against by every NO NUKES Liberal in NH, ME, MA.

There were NO EVACUATION POSSIBLE signs on the causeway to Plum Island, MA for thirty years. It would have been in the fifteen mile circle IF the reactor ever melted down.
They got federal approval to build two reactors there. They only built one. Today(40 years later) it still is the number one provider of electricity to the state of NH. What they really need to do is BUILD the other reactor. Before the current one is not longer viable. Meaning we need to PLAN AHEAD.


19 posted on 09/10/2025 7:56:04 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

It’s marginally more expensive to use US flag vessel so to Increase profits they use tricks. This makes no difference to you the end ussr. When the cargo is worth millions the price YOU pay is unchanged.


20 posted on 09/10/2025 8:09:44 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson