It turns out that a quote from this article is a bit misleading.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled MAHA Chief Medical Advisor: "...highly likely the Covid vaccines have been a significant factor in the cancer of members of the Royal family.” (w/TRANSCRIPT of 2 minute video), Revel wrote: It turns out that a quote from this article is a bit misleading.
Thank you for pointing that out - I would have missed it otherwise.
I do think that Trump is asking for accountability from the C19 vax companies lately - saying all data shown him was great, but Pfizer never showed the public that data. So he's asking, do they work or not. That word, 'work', stands out just a little. When he initially made that statement in 2020, offering money for fast tracking the vax, I noticed his emphasis on the word 'work.' Recently I noticed the same emphasis. So Pfizer and Moderna have to explain why the data they showed him was never given to the public, and they have to defeat the world wide evidence that they don't work (and we know they don't work).
So Pfizer can't explain why it showed President Trump data that was perfect or ideal and why it never showed the public. It can't show they worked. That seems like standard fraud, and I think 'fraud vitiates everything.' In other words, the vax companies were not liable due to legal 'gifts' protecting them from liability. But, if they committed fraud, then they become liable for the harm (vaccine harm) they caused. That last part is just me soaking up comments - so I might be wrong. I have zero legal training. But this is global fraud and crimes against humanity in my book.At the very least I think he can severely damage or collapse the pharmas by requiring the return of the vast sums of money they made based on fraudulent data they showed him - and failing to honestly meet his standard (that they 'work').