Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals Court Rules That President Trump's Emergency Tariff Gambit Is Unlawful
Manhattan Contrarian ^ | 30 Aug, 2025 | Francis Menton

Posted on 09/02/2025 5:18:54 AM PDT by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: woodpusher

The overall argument is does Congress have the authority to abrogate their plenary power to the executive branch at all.

Congress could also end all this by simply passing a joint resolution with a veto proof majority saying as sinply as all previous laws pertaining to tariffs are null and void with all such powers returned fully to Congress for a period ending Jan 21,2029 or forever its up to them.


41 posted on 09/02/2025 7:03:55 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

It’s looking more like the appeals court gets off on being shot doun by supreme court they keep doing it.


42 posted on 09/02/2025 7:06:31 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ

“It’s not that I dispute that statement at all — it’s that lower courts and judges routinely defy SCOTUS whenever they feel like it. What is to be done in those instances?”

Congress has the power to remove judges who defy SCOTUS that is their job after all. It’s a political question not a statutory legal one. If Congress chooses to do nothing that is also their power. The people can vote them out next round if they want different outcomes.

POTUS is facing a hostile Congress they will remove him again its a political not a legal question as all impeachments are purely up to politics the USSC has zero say nor does any other court. It’s two houses , two votes that’s all that matters the rest is political theater.


43 posted on 09/02/2025 7:08:45 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Congress does not presently have to agree with the President. But to stop the emergency they need to pass a joint resolution. We can wait as long as Congress wants to take even if it takes forever. Congress not acting means the President can continue to act.


44 posted on 09/02/2025 7:18:58 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
We do need protection and counter protection but not on a world trade war scale.

Our financial elite with the help of our big consultancies declared economic world war on us when they offshored our economy to the enormous profit of themselves and the enormous loss of the American productive classes.

Tariffs are noting but a tax on someone and that someone is almost always the consumer.

Dear wrong. Go read Ricardo on the theory of economic rents. We are taxing the enormous economic rents from offshoring our economy. We are taxing the excess profits thereon. They have no ability to raise domestic prices here in the US.

I love the sulphureous smell of free traitors in the morning because your so-called free trade ignores all of the necessary components for free market economics. The problem with you version of free trade is that it is all rigged.

45 posted on 09/02/2025 7:27:27 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson; Publius

muh pernt


46 posted on 09/02/2025 7:28:10 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (There are no more conspiracy theories, only questions that further the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

[[Congress not acting means the President can continue to act.]]

That’s the way I understood the lawyer to mean.


47 posted on 09/02/2025 8:05:27 AM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GenXPolymath

“ I predict it will be 9-0 that Congress and only Congress can dictate tariffs unless they specifically and with much limits allow the executive temporarily to impose them until such time as a full vote in both houses can be taken.”

And I predict the Supreme Court will follow the principles it annunciated in Field v. Clark and J.W. Hampton. The Tarrifs will be upheld.


48 posted on 09/02/2025 8:13:42 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Ricky Ricardo? I didn’t know he was an economist as well as a band leader.

What would those necessary components of free market economics be that are being ignored?

Not worth the argument for me. Time will prove someone right. Nobody’s crystal ball is all that clear but the past I have experienced when steel tariffs were raised had nothing to do with economic rents, prices just went up across the board and it was the end user that paid the price.


49 posted on 09/02/2025 9:01:32 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GenXPolymath

SHut up you Marxist.


50 posted on 09/02/2025 10:48:29 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
"If congress were capable of doing their job they would have done this by now."

Remember the backstabbing performance of the GOP Congress in 2017...

The feckless GOP has one function (in their own minds):
Protect their long-term access to the financial security of being a congressperson, even if in the minority, over any responsibility to the GOP voters who sent them to DC...

51 posted on 09/02/2025 1:29:04 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Grow up and behave.


52 posted on 09/03/2025 4:20:52 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Fury

So are you CCP kiss ass also?


53 posted on 09/03/2025 4:24:49 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: central_va

LOL!

You can’t argue the point without insults.

Behave.

Get to work.


54 posted on 09/03/2025 6:16:47 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Answer the question.


55 posted on 09/04/2025 4:31:10 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson