Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Pauly Shore Found Out He Had a Tumor That Caused No Symptoms: ‘Instinct Played a Huge Role’
New York Post ^ | Aug. 30, 2025 | McKenzie Beard

Posted on 09/01/2025 11:26:21 AM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Hot Tabasco

You’re welcome. Happy to help.


21 posted on 09/01/2025 1:43:25 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Hit and miss. I like several of his movies.


22 posted on 09/01/2025 1:49:48 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

How do they know it’s been in him for 2 decades? Did he have a scan in 2005 that showed a dot of a tumor?


23 posted on 09/01/2025 1:53:40 PM PDT by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Good Gosh!! The *testimonies*, at that site you linked, sound like surgeons wildest dreams.

Good thing they had these scans so so many tumors could be removed, chemo rounds given and heart by-passes completed.


24 posted on 09/01/2025 2:01:45 PM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Milner

It’s a good question, and the article does not provide that info. In general, though, there are methods to estimate how quickly cells are dividing and tissue is growing. If you apply the estimated growth rate to the tumor’s current size, you can roughly guess its age.


25 posted on 09/01/2025 2:05:26 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Princeton Longevity “ in NJ advertised heavily here on the east coast. They do a whole body scan. You’re there for the day. They go over it with you right then and there. I think I looked up the cost and it was 5000. 00 not 500.00 but I could be wrong


26 posted on 09/01/2025 2:23:02 PM PDT by TalBlack (Their god is government. Prepare for a religious war.https://freerepublic.com/perl/post?id=4322961%2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The tumor was small slow growing and benign. The unnecessary operation he submitted to was way more of a danger to his life than just leaving it alone and keeping an eye on it.


27 posted on 09/01/2025 3:04:27 PM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimwatx

I’m not sure we can know that without actual medical information.


28 posted on 09/01/2025 3:06:48 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Folks, I highly urge people to get at least one of these scans done. I have had three, over the years. For $500, you can have this done with the company we used for the two most recent scans (Ezra):

What kind of contrast do they use?

29 posted on 09/01/2025 5:04:49 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: erlayman
They did not have the shorter scan available, so we had the $1,499 scan and it looks at the back vertebrae and likely has more detail available than the $499 one, but as I see it, there's not much difference, now, between them, outside of that.

We had ours on a trip to Florida. You can find out the types of MRI scanners available. I chose one that had the highest-end capabilities, at those times.

I can say I did not have any cancers or other lurking issues, as of a point in time. It did measure my prostate and tell my wife the number and sizes of uterine fibroids, so those are examples of added insights. There are a lot of organs covered, mainly because the slices taken cover them.

30 posted on 09/01/2025 5:13:48 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

No contrast is used.


31 posted on 09/01/2025 5:14:15 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
No contrast is used

Great. I'm seeing down side to this test.

32 posted on 09/01/2025 5:20:58 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
...no down side to this test.
33 posted on 09/01/2025 5:21:47 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

What is the downside?


34 posted on 09/01/2025 5:29:15 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Gotcha.


35 posted on 09/01/2025 5:29:32 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson