I don’t get that post except that it sounds angry and bitter.
As far as elderly and handicapped, there are vast variations among them, many elderly don’t need or want you telling them that they have to buy beans and rice and flour for the rest of their lives, they want to stick what they can eat, and will eat, although they have lost interest in preparing meals and cooking from scratch, if cheez whiz and crackers is tonight’s supper, so be it, perhaps breakfast will be pop-tarts.
Same with the handicapped, most of them function around the house, but if they are on food stamps for the rest of their lives , rice and beans won’t cut it, they may want to microwave a can of chile over a bag of cheetos when they don’t feel up to baking bread to go with their beans and rice, for the 3,000th meal in a row.
No, it’s not angry or bitter. You’re reading into the written word meaning or intent that is not there.
But you clearly have already decided What I’m thinking and feeling and trying to convince you otherwise is an exercise in futility.
But I refuse at this point in my life to engage with others who go on the offensive and demand I defend myself fabricated false accusations against me. If you had asked for clarification from me, this whole conversation could have gone different. But to attack and falsely accuse and then demand that I answer and am accountable to you. No go.
Since you have already decided what I’m thinking and feeling, I see no chance to convince you otherwise and see no point in wasting any more time engaging.
So fine, think what you want. Make yourself feel better and morally superior about yourself by engaging with any others and engaging in character assassination. I do not care and this conversation is dover. I will not even be reading any other responses from here on out, so don’t waste your time trying.
Have a good evening.