“”I have yet to see anyone supporting what he does no questions asked.
And while I can support his policies, it doesn’t mean that I default support him or everything else he advocates for.””
I’m feeling deja vuey all of a sudden. We’ve had this conversation before...? My point, again, is... what he is pushing re: more government restrictions is a slippery slope that most here on this thread seem perfectly fine with. Which I don’t get, if they are Conservatives. It does not compute.
We know how this can and usually does lead to other “government restrictions” that we will NOT like or approve of, once the Democrats regain control. And...supporting him on this policy can lead to him getting support for his “other” policies that you may not agree with (like wearables). While we agree on most other issues, I don’t understand why my point on this is so hard to understand.
Well, support the welfare deadbeats and cheats with your own money.
The government should not even be in the charity business in the first place.
Government restrictions on other’s money that they hand out is not unreasonable.
Besides, if you want to get technical, any laws that exist are *government “restrictions”* on us.
So you’re in favor of anarchy, rape, murder, theft, etc. to be fine and not restricted by the government? Just allow people to do whatever they want, period, full stop?