I hate to state it, but you took the bait. I wrote ‘excuses’ with intent.
Alrighty, then.
We needed demonstrable leadership on the absolutely right thing to do and all they did was expose themselves for waiting...and didn’t take enough action on the matter soon enough.
If the jabs aren’t dangerous, then no action was necessary.
If they are dangerous, then delayed action - SEVEN MONTHS - is downright criminally negligent.
The public trust in government was destroyed under the plandemic. Additionally, WHEN (not ‘if’) the jabs are proven to be dangerous (they are still authorized, but not under eua), trust is out the window (and yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ proven true). I have no idea where you’re coming from in most of your comment.
Frankly, neither do I care today.
I think you proved my point that those who demand explanations with, “I’m waiting” have already made their minds up.
“If they are dangerous, then delayed action - SEVEN MONTHS - is downright criminally negligent.”
And I said JFK Jr’s day 2 decision, which you proposed, would be rejected by the public and set a bad precedent for officials in that position making edicts before they have any medical proof to back them up.
I could compare the rest of our posts, but we won’t agree on anything.