Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump says US learns from Ukraine’s use of drones in war
RBC Ukraine MSN News ^ | 8/25/2025 | Kateryna Serohina

Posted on 08/26/2025 10:51:58 AM PDT by marcusmaximus

US President Donald Trump said America is studying Ukraine’s use of drones in warfare, according to remarks he made to reporters.

Responding to a question, Trump noted that the war in Ukraine is being fought with drones in a way not seen before - and that the US is examining those lessons closely.

Trump stated that there hadn’t been a war of that scale since World War II and that it was the most significant development in the history of military affairs. He added that it was a completely new form of combat, a drone war, something that hadn’t existed before. He noted that he, Pete Hegseth, and others were studying it very closely, and that it was a completely new kind of war, albeit a brutal one.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: drones; imazeeper; katerynalikesbbc; katerynaserohina; marcuslikesbbc; marcusridiculous; specialdronesock; ukraine

1 posted on 08/26/2025 10:51:58 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

I don’t get the impression that we’re learning much. The Ukrainians and the Russians and even the chinese seem to be years ahead of us on drones.


2 posted on 08/26/2025 10:57:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Every war is a weapons test lab for the next one.


3 posted on 08/26/2025 10:59:50 AM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

The silicon chip has changed the nature of warfare. Hopefully from what the US military observed in Ukraine and during the Armenian-Azerbaijan war they stop investing huge sums in naval surface combatants ad land armored vehicles.


4 posted on 08/26/2025 11:03:12 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

This is the funniest headline I’ve read lately! Hello! The US military are using this war as a training / experiment environment.


5 posted on 08/26/2025 11:17:12 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
I don't get the impression that we're learning much. The Ukrainians and the Russians and even the chinese seem to be years ahead of us on drones.


The current media buzz about drones and how the Ukraine and Russia have advanced way past the US is a lot of BS media buzz.

The US is light years ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to drones, we just don't publicize our developments.

The current implementation of drones in Ukraine is a low tech solution to a war fought by adversaries who have run out of high tech weapons and high value targets.

The drones both sides are using would not have near the success against the US military.

What both the Ukrainians and the Russians have come up with are some innovative uses for marginally capable, low payload $2000-$10, 000 drones to stand in for weapons like the Javelin while still having an individual soldier real time ISR capability.

In fact, a lot of the ordnance that the Ukraine is using is bomblets and anti armor shaped charges pulled from US supplied ATACM cluster munition warheads that they have run out of US supplied missiles to deliver and either adapted to be dropped from drone or reverse engineered Ukraine produced knock offs. .

That said, the Ukraine and Russia have pioneered a new type of warfare capability that the US needs to evaluate, refine and implement.

6 posted on 08/26/2025 11:21:37 AM PDT by rdcbn1 (..when poets buy guns, tourist season is over................Walter R. Mead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

DoD is partnering with Palmer Luckey’s company, Anduril, the most advanced drone developer [both defense and offense] in the USA ... Palmer Luckey is the Elon Musk of drones ...


7 posted on 08/26/2025 11:30:16 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Don’t kid yourself; our military activity at Nellis in Nevada and Alamogordo in New Mexico have been devoted to this for years.


8 posted on 08/26/2025 11:33:50 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

And so is the rest of the world.


9 posted on 08/26/2025 11:45:02 AM PDT by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Specifically the Mexican drug cartels who have recieved not only drone training from the Ukies but also shoulder fired anti tank and aircraft missiles from the Ukie run black market.


10 posted on 08/26/2025 11:47:54 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

If you think drones are scary don’t start contemplating what you flying things terrorists can make out of cardboard, a glue gun couple of servos hooked up to a rasberry pi/arduino and small lithium battery.


11 posted on 08/26/2025 11:47:54 AM PDT by datricker (Go Trump/Vance! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf; Brilliant

Could be wrong but my impression is that until now we’ve focused on high dollar high altitude surveillance drones whereas this war is fought with swarms of drones cheap enough that they use them even to go after individual soldiers. They are burning through thousands of one-way drones a month.


12 posted on 08/26/2025 11:58:35 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

I vaguely remember a picture in my high school history text where foreign observers were present watching the Revolutionary War battles.


13 posted on 08/26/2025 12:02:38 PM PDT by Cold Heart (Democrats protect criminals and prosecute innocents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

“”””The US is light years ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to drones, we just don’t publicize our developments.””””

That is my impression as well, and a lot of it is defense against drones, we have been at it for many, many, years.


14 posted on 08/26/2025 12:18:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1
“The US is light years ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to drones, we just don't publicize our developments.

The current implementation of drones in Ukraine is a low tech solution to a war fought by adversaries who have run out of high tech weapons and high value targets.”

That's true but the Ukes have more practical experience of using drones in combat than anyone else and a lot of knowledge how russians are using them. The mass use of micro drones might be needed in case of full scale war as the stocks of those high-end weapons are limited + the micro drones are unfortunately the perfect weapon for terrorists, organized crime etc. so I'm afraid we're going to see more of it in the coming years.

15 posted on 08/26/2025 2:43:09 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

The big threat from low cost drones is terrorism and internal sabotage and those are very real threats that are very difficult to counter

Without a doubt drones are going to be a major threat going forward and coordinated mass attacks either drones using flocking algorithms can be very effective at overwhelming defensive systems

But the kind of attacks by lone FPV drones we see in Ukraine would not be as effective against an American military


16 posted on 08/26/2025 3:28:30 PM PDT by rdcbn1 (..when poets buy guns, tourist season is over................Walter R. Mead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Maybe this is part of the reason for investing in intel chips. Our drone production and counter-drone technology needs to maintain many steps ahead for this coming new type of engagement. It is coming and already employed elsewhere. The chips which are necessary, better be made in the US, rather relying on other nations for them.

Our enemies are already planning on how to use drones to attacks us.

REMEMBER the stealth attack on Russian bombers? Then the same type attack happened elsewhere a few weeks later. Then, a few days later, all of our bombers abandoned a ME airbase. Intel was on the learning curve, or probably had knowledge of a credible threat.

The threat of drone warfare is not limited to nation on nation warfare. Terrorists are already scheming and some potential scenarios are ugly.

Recall holiday drone “shows” all controlled to preplanned, choreographed positions from one computer? Wisdom asks; “What other ways could this technology be used?”

Yes, we had better be many many steps ahead in the technology, because it’s coming.

It’s said; “knowledge is power”
This is a half-truth
Knowledge is mere facts.
On the other hand, wisdom is the application of knowledge, history, experience, tact and timing. Wisdom is power.

When I think of drones, I’m eerily reminded about swarms of unusual looking locusts spoken about roughly 1900 years ago. To that man anyway, they ~looked~ like locusts.


17 posted on 08/26/2025 3:58:33 PM PDT by Z28.310 (does not comply well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marron
Could be wrong but my impression is that until now we’ve focused on high dollar high altitude surveillance drones whereas this war is fought with swarms of drones cheap enough that they use them even to go after individual soldiers. They are burning through thousands of one-way drones a month.

Most of our stuff is the big fancy stuff. Think Reapers, Predators, Global Hawk, etc. And we have some small troop/platoon level surveillance systems like the Raven and its replacement. We aren't flying masses of cheap COTS quadcopters at close range. Which provide some intel for indirect, but are only mostly useful offensively against less-disciplined, poorly-armed, trench warfare style militories.

US Doctrine isn't a good opponent for the type of warfare you see in Ukraine, we don't leave all of our air power 100 miles behind the front line while troops just sit for the most part and kinda drive down the road for a push every so often. We have space-based surveillance, effective aerial ISR platforms, a large number of cruise missiles, much more effective aircraft, etc. We conduct joint warfare, not single service (Army) just trading punches from the trench.

If we did get hot with Russia, we wouldn't confine it to Ukraine. Their entire Artic and Pacific shorelines would be vulnerable, with insufficient manpower to even staff their crappy gear along those entire fronts. And that's just the places we can strike directly without getting other countries approval for flyover/transit. Russia's only real defense against these US is their nuclear deterrent, and even that would be extremely questionable on how many ballistics they have that are maintained enough to be functional. If even able to leave the silo. And all that's before our missile defense.
18 posted on 08/28/2025 7:40:39 AM PDT by Svartalfiar (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson