If This Is Pro-Life, We Are In Big Trouble

New American Prophet ^ | August 23, 2025 | Jeffrey Ludwig

[Rev M. Bresciani]

In a recent article, Jenna Ellis remains anti-abortion, but in her so-called compassion for women who have abortions, she comes too close to justifying their decision. Her article reads more like a piece that could have been written by Hillary Clinton defending the need for abortion rather than promoting anti-abortion goals. She lists all the good practical reasons and the pressures put on women by their men to have abortions.

Reading her pro-life article, it seems that pro-life proponents must find themselves supporting vast therapy networks. It seems she is calling for policies that invest vast sums of money so that both men and women do not feel so threatened by accepting the baby's birth. However, she ignores God's role. Those difficult circumstances are nothing compared to the distortions and ultimately miserable God-generated circumstances if they sorrowfully accept the need to kill that baby, that human, that soul-bearing individual. This is high school pro-abortion drivel claiming to be anti-abortion. There is no reference to Almighty God. There is no mention of the guilt that follows abortion. There is no mention of the social consequences of abortion -- losing millions of people contributing to Social Security or persons available to serve in the military or to pay taxes that support our government. There is no mention of the joys of child rearing. The supposedly pro-life article relates all the fears of the women and the men who procreated these children and seems to want the readers to be more sympathetic with the irresponsible choices of those individuals who desire to have more "control" over their lives.

The irony here is that the women have in many cases become pregnant because of LACK OF SELF CONTROL. They want more self-control over their lives so they can have less self-control.

---

TOPICS: Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralviolation; selfcontrol

[Rev M. Bresciani]

Getting quite tired of this.

Let me help you. I publish articles under the name that is used in the submission. Take up the matter of a missing initial with the author - not me.

All the articles at N.A.P. are derived by one of three methods.

1. They are sent directly by the author periodically and/or regularly.

2. Some articles are taken from websites that allow us. and encourage us, to use any content we choose.

3. Some websites allow us to pull only certain authors from their pages.

Since you have no knowledge beforehand of how the articles came to us, anything you say is false, at best, and possibly slanderous at worst.

Two things remain.

First, calling me a thief and a liar on a public forum goes beyond trolling; it is defamatory, and it is also against the law.

Lastly, Yes, I am a good Reverend. I would have to be the dumbest preacher in the world to steal intellectual property from others. Even a dumb preacher knows they cannot defy the words God has spoken to us all in Exodus 20:15

Do you ever encourage anyone or learn something after you read material here at FR? It must be difficult to play the role of the sheriff where you were never appointed or elected.