Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

The problem is, if AI does a good job 99% of the time, what about that 1% when it messes up? And who will know how to fix it?


3 posted on 08/21/2025 9:39:32 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

I just asked Perplexity.ai which NFC division the AFC West will play in 2026. It actually claimed that the AFC West played the NFC West in 2024, when it played the NFC South. That was a VERY straightforward question to botch.


4 posted on 08/21/2025 9:48:54 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
The problem is, if AI does a good job 99% of the time, what about that 1% when it messes up?


11 posted on 08/22/2025 1:50:02 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
The problem is, if AI does a good job 99% of the time, what about that 1% when it messes up? And who will know how to fix it?

My personal experience with AI in computer programming over the past year is that AI is childish, hallucinates, and outright lies to me, but it is brilliant, analyzes and prints data at superspeed, and can communicate with me in normal language. I'll never code without AI ever again.

AI today is an indispensable tool, in many fields, but requires human supervision and guidance. It can't do anything on its own. Think of AI as the hyper-paralegal, but the clueless attorney who can't prepare a case.

12 posted on 08/22/2025 2:08:33 AM PDT by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

At least for what we do in engineering, it’s amazing how much it can assist when used in the right context. That said, it’s a “use but review” approach, although that is no different than if an engineer didn’t have the tool. Everything must be reviewed by people. There’s so much busy work, especially when it comes to writing requirements and test cases - where the process of writing by AI is far beyond any human, in terms of speed.

We’re also using it to translate documentation from engineers where their English is sub-par (2nd language), basically rewrite so we have a consistent reading level.

I suppose my argument is, yes it’ll mess up - but when do humans not? What is the error rate in any job done by a human? For us, it’s not replacing people, it’s making them more productive. I still need dozens more people. Although there’s definitely clerical positions that might be at risk.


21 posted on 08/22/2025 6:11:12 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson