I’ve read about Loeb before. He’s a brilliant scientist but has some nutty ideas from time to time.
He’s a brilliant scientist but has some nutty ideas from time to time.
—
Who happens to be correct most of the time. And when he’s wrong, he’s not far off.
Just because posters on this thread refuse to believe observed science, does not make the science false, it just makes the posters look like willfully close-minded fools.