Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Flaw In Blood Pressure Tests Could Be Giving Millions The Wrong Reading
Study Finds ^ | August 12, 2025 | Kate Bassil and Anurag Agarwal (University of Cambridge)

Posted on 08/13/2025 9:35:38 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 08/13/2025 9:35:38 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The real problem is that these stupid new automatic devices have wildly-varying results... truly all over the map. And they’re laughable when the batteries are anywhere near weak.


2 posted on 08/13/2025 9:47:52 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The studies that came up with the original results for BP would have been done with the same cuffs so the base line would be off by the same amount.


3 posted on 08/13/2025 9:50:19 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Does this mean all the problems associated with high blood pressure are off by the same 6-10 points? If so, why does it make a difference?

I have had issues with HBP for 30 years. On several medications. Need to lose about 30 pounds. Have reduced salt in my diet drastically.

My cardiologist says to take my BP first thing every morning immediately after emptying my bladder.

Two things:

1. If my arm rests on the table about 12” below my heart level reading are about 10mm higher than if I have it resting on a surface at the level of my heart. (Which is how it is supposed to be read.)

2. I normally take evening pills about 8:00 PM. If I delay even a half an hour the readings are another 10-15mm lower than if I take meds at 8:00. Almost like I’m catching their effectiveness just before it drops off.


4 posted on 08/13/2025 9:51:44 AM PDT by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

I’ve found that those *&#^@ machines ALWAYS read too high and I’ve had plenty of nurses tell me so.

When I get a manual, done by a real human being, blood pressure, it’s almost always close to my usual.

When they use that blankety-blank machine, it adjusts the pressure and about squeezes my arm off and takes FOREVER to deflate.

And they wonder why it reads high.

And then of course, they show concern and start talking blood pressure meds.

What I finally did with my PCP was told her to look at the readings from my allergy shots and when she did, she dropped the subject.


5 posted on 08/13/2025 9:54:35 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So many variables when measuring BP....My primary care and cardiologist have both actually cautioned me against monitoring it TOO much.


6 posted on 08/13/2025 9:55:31 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

For these and other factors the best method IMO is aggregation of data; several readings across different days/times to discern the average and median.


7 posted on 08/13/2025 10:05:43 AM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: metmom

My wife has high blood pressure. Her is always lower at the DR when done manually as opposed to the auto.

For home I bought an Oxiline ($100) that is tested to be 99% accurate and comes with a lifetime warranty. It’s proven to live up to that for us.

As regards the people in the article that might get a reading of 135 when it might read 142 when done manually - too bad, you’re gonna die. And soon.

Seriously, docs are pushing meds on anyone that is above 130 anyway. They are not “missing” people who *need* treatment because of 5-7 points. That’s just hooey.


8 posted on 08/13/2025 10:08:31 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

IOW, the supposed high blood pressure is actually 20 higher than the supposed healthy average. Panic porn. 😎


9 posted on 08/13/2025 10:12:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (The moron troll Ted Holden believes that humans originated on Ganymede.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They’re all broken. Just like the doctor scales are broken. All of them claim I am fat.


10 posted on 08/13/2025 10:20:15 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

My doc practice is a traditional MD and holistic MD.

When my BP slightly high, the holistic MD said, “Do you want the traditional med approach or my recommendation. I said both. So she prescribed a med, but then said, lose weight, take beet juice, drink lemon water and hibiscus tea. And use potassium chloride but be ready to adjust it based on diet etc (I.e., don’t overdose on potassium)

I haven’t lost all the weight I want, but even with her natural approaches, my BP dropped by 15-20.


11 posted on 08/13/2025 10:21:29 AM PDT by LilFarmer (Isaiah 54:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer

And I haven’t taken the med


12 posted on 08/13/2025 10:22:17 AM PDT by LilFarmer (Isaiah 54:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hey, wait a minute - mine does too! I think it’s a conspiracy.


13 posted on 08/13/2025 10:26:12 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Crap. I was hoping they’d say they were reading too high. Wah!


14 posted on 08/13/2025 10:27:18 AM PDT by vpintheak (Screw the ChiComms! America first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I use a wrist monitor. It seems to be reliable.


15 posted on 08/13/2025 10:32:34 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1789. Death Certificate - 2021? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I have a machine at home and check my blood pressure every morning for both arms. The readings are sometimes quite a bit different even though it’s just a couple of minutes between one reading and the other. I usually get better readings from the Red Cross when I give blood.


16 posted on 08/13/2025 10:32:37 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Exactly!


17 posted on 08/13/2025 10:38:30 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

140/90 used to be considered normal.


18 posted on 08/13/2025 10:40:12 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

People who are obsessed with taking their blood pressure are usually the first to die.


19 posted on 08/13/2025 10:48:49 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

billions of bp readings taken over decades, and they claim to come up with one systemic error? That goes beyond Occam’s razor to some quantized demon.But it will promote more prescriptions. I do wonder how many higher readings are accepted by not allowing 10 minutes between first and second readings at doctor’s office.


20 posted on 08/13/2025 10:56:28 AM PDT by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson