Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul R.

I get it... There is actually quite a bit to it all. As a musician I was fortunate to play with it a lot. Lot of recording dynamics, stage set up, and fine tuning.

A lot of what you are going to get as playback all depends on the equipment it was recorded on at the time. So much stuff ignored that would be absolutely incredible on modern systems if it was remastered... :)


17 posted on 08/12/2025 10:42:46 AM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Openurmind
There is actually quite a bit to it all.

Now, there's an understatement! 100% agreed on that one. And I'm 70 and think that despite my best efforts, I only learned about 10% of what I really wish I could have.

Granted that that applies to everything.

Agreed also on that last, except it would depend on who was doing the remastering (or re-recording, which may be what you really mean), and their purpose. Most remasters of rock, pop, country, etc., actually got worse in many respects. Have you ever checked out the Dynamic Range Database at dr.loudness-war.info?

Of course, dynamic range isn't "everything". Not by a long shot. But, I've had fairly good luck with buying CD's that rate highly on that website. Very often they are overseas releases.

23 posted on 08/12/2025 11:19:23 AM PDT by Paul R. (Old Viking saying: "Never be more than 3 steps away from your weapon ... or a Uriah Heep song!" ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson