Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pete Dovgan

For the guy who ran on he would get us out of endless foreign wars this sure sounds like an escalation.


16 posted on 07/29/2025 11:24:28 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: McGruff

Was a guy on today that pointed out the fact that every president, including GW Bush, ran on “no endless wars and nation building” agenda.

Every single one, including Trump, ignored that promise after elected.

Which points to the fact, no matter who is voted in, they have no intention of keeping that promise.


41 posted on 07/29/2025 11:47:36 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

That’s exactly what I think “Stuffs” is. It’s and escalation.

When you want a ‘peace treaty’ sometimes you have to force people to the table. Think Linebacker II.

To those concerned about the Abrams tanks and bradleys and ditches, please familiarize yourself with the terms ‘mobile warfare’ and ‘breakouts’. Those things become realities when you control the airspace. Pilots? No problem, peacekeepers can patrol Ukraine airspace and Ukraine pilots could fly to Moscow.

Perhaps Vlad the Invader would prefer to sit at the table with Ukraine occupying Russian territory? I absolutely don’t put this past Donald Trump. Keep in mind, war is expensive, the quicker it’s over the cheaper it will be, IMHO.

Anybody wants to know what side I am on, it’s the one where Ukrainians and Russians aren’t killing each other in a pointless war, while China eyes Siberia to become the next world power.


50 posted on 07/29/2025 12:10:52 PM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson