I was around for it. Sounds like you want the old way. I’m for treating everyone as an individual, all around.
There is not actual evidence to support a theory that would back up your association, but I suspect there is something to it. That is that with many mammals, for example, there is a pecking order with the dominant males, yes, producing more testosterone. With our old world, which you seem to prefer, men were on top simply for being men. I would guess that to produce at least a smidge more testosterone up and down the ranks.
In my world, where individuals get whatever status or jobs they earn (though if we’d kick out 50 million illegals all Americans could, should they make the choice, afford to marry and raise a family with just one income earner—and we’d probably be much happier and better off with that), more testosterone-rich men would naturally be in leadership positions, but those women who want and earn such roles would be fine and accepted as well.
You keep personalizing this for some reason, what is your trip?
You can also quit lying and making up your own negative thoughts and claiming they are mine.
Your posts are vague and I don’t even know what you are trying to say but I do detect some anger and bitterness, is it that you liked the feminist movement and its results?