Posted on 07/22/2025 1:32:57 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
No. I am stating that your comment was contemptuous of women officials, even though they are doing jobs men have done and failed at. I am certain that you would not immediately call a man sexually immoral if he failed as a public official. It's not racist, it's down and dirty prejudice against women.
I can live with that.
Apparently so.
Explained here:
The Parliamentary Motive Behind the J6 Fedsurrection (Mar 12, 2023)
From 2-1/2 years ago.
This is the only place I have ever read what really happened.
It has long been known as FACT.
BFLR
Why? He’s usually right just about everything. Also, he’s first to the punch.
The fly always knew. Obama/fly, Pence/fly.
The article I mentioned were posted on FR 2 times that day.
The Parliamentary Motive Behind the J6 Fedsurrection (Mar 12, 2023)
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/03/12/the-parliamentary-motive-behind-the-j6-fedsurrection/#more-244239
-
FR Comments: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4138063/posts
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4137635/posts
At the time, some tried to say that they could bring up the certification issues with the election results, but closing the opening and then beginning again in new session gave them the opportunity to not invoke the normal sequence of events. They Could have, but did NOT allow the certification issues up.
Pence/Pelosi
Tulsi Gabbard may not have the power to indict and prosecute Obama, but she putting Bondi in a position where she has not other option. Trump has done the same thing. I believe Bondi will try to indict Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.