“ The Times published an extraordinarily candid probe into how militarised drones have irrevocably revolutionised warfare in the 21st century”
This is how to start an article.
It’s remarkable in that it seems most articles ramble about for 2 or 3 paragraphs before getting to the point they’re trying to make.
Drones will do nothing but advance in terms of lethality and numbers, it’s relatively nothing to build them, with modern manufacturing millions can be built in a short amount of time and no effective defense exists at the present time.
Someone will develop a counter drone defense that is effective and cost efficient, whoever does that will gain a major step up on the modern battlefield.
The most maddening are articles that keep repeating the headline in many ways without getting to the answer, paragraph after paragraph of repeating the headline question in various ways with the answer buried way down the page.