There has to be some consequence for these rogue judges. The democRATs won’t let them be impeached.
Number Three-——The Obama-directed RussiaGate Lie
DNI head Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents in her possession which, in her words “detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate.” Her entire presentation of the history of this seditious conspiracy which began on December 8, 2016 is neatly organized on this thread.
It’s true Devin Nunes and his then investigator Kash Patel uncovered this plot seven years ago, but without the ability then to declassify the documentation as Gabbard has done. She has transmitted all this material to the Department of Justice, and James Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan should, if they have not yet done so, seek counsel in yet another boon for D.C.’s criminal defense attorneys. (It’s likely that the same white-shoe law firms that rushed to defend the thugs in Gitmo — but not the J 6 defendants — will volunteer some services and some independent funding will pour in to help, but they can’t be happy to be so publicly exposed and facing serious legal jeopardy.) And those further down who engaged in or covered up what they knew are unlikely to be so lucky. As for the “lightbringer,” check out the 2016 Trump swearing-in ceremony and watch Obama, who had already set in motion something no former president has ever done, sabotaging his successor. Knowing what he had set in motion just weeks before, even his adherents can never look at him in the same way again.
Jeff Childers explains what is so monumental about what Gabbard has done.
It defied every norm of intelligence conduct. The DNI normally never speaks publicly about ongoing investigations, it has never accused former administrations of treason (or any crime), and certainly does not weaponize the credibility of the office to ignite a public reckoning. This marks the first time in modern history that the intelligence community’s internal coup (if proven) has been openly exposed by its own leadership, transforming the IC from a shield into a spotlight, and potentially rewriting the entire post-9/11 national security order. [snip] Here’s a list of all the records Tulsi just shattered, in a single Twitter thread and 124 pages of declassified documents. And this list is only what I could think of as of this morning:
1. First sitting Director of National Intelligence to publicly accuse former intelligence leaders of a treasonous conspiracy (or any crime).
2. First time a DNI declassified internal IC assessments, memos, and emails during an active DOJ referral.
3. First full publication of an aborted Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) draft that contradicted an official narrative.
4. First evidence-based accusation that the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) was politicized by presidential directive.
5. First direct public attribution of intelligence manipulation to a sitting president — Barack Obama — by name, not just implication.
6. First official public confirmation that the Steele Dossier was used in the 2017 ICA, despite internal dissent and known credibility issues.
7. First use of a Twitter thread as an official vehicle for declassifying national intelligence — turning social media into a disclosure mechanism.
8. First coordinated public release of IC whistleblower complaints, dissenting analyst emails, and interagency meeting notes in a single drop.
9. First breach of the classified means credible doctrine — by showing how classification was weaponized to create false public certainty. This one has many legs.
10. First dismantling of the we can’t comment on ongoing investigations playbook by someone inside the intel chain of command.
11. First time the post-Trump impeachment “insurrection” narrative has been turned against the intelligence agencies that constructed it.
12. First voluntary public declassification of internal IC meeting notes confirming political coordination of IC messaging — without subpoenas and before the usual years of Congressional hearings and wrangling.
snip