[corlorde]

You might want to look at that again.

https://x.com/seanmdav/status/1946015682262421888

[cgbg]

Good post.

The WSJ attorneys should have done that same due diligence while vetting the article—but obviously they did not.

[Lod881019]

So he used it once in a book around 2004…didn’t use it for 11 years….then hasn’t used it again for another 9 years…Riiggght. You do know the lead writer of WSJ article is tied to Mary Jacoby right?