Well I have read many Hadiths and it seems clear to me that Muhammed existed.
Yeah I know you added the clarification that the story really states “he didn’t exist as portrayed”. But if the article misrepresents the story with a false headline then it can’t be trusted.
Cheers. :-)
He covers the origins of the Hadiths.
they prove nothing and are themselves very problematic as to their origins.
But then again , you didn't bother to watch and learn.
You can believe anything you like, but it's just unbased belief.
You sound like the UK academic that refused to debate this man in public , but demanded an academic closed door debate.
That's called a “ tell” in the US.
I have read many Hadiths
—
You do realize that the Hadiths and Sunnahs were written and compiled from the translation of Old Syriac on old carpets and tattered wall-hangings 200 years after the supposed death of Mohammad?