[so_real]

To be included in our study, children needed to be alive at age 2 years, not have emigrated from Denmark, not have been diagnosed with certain congenital or preexisting conditions (including congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory conditions, primary immune deficiency, and heart or liver failure), and not have received an implausible number of vaccines (Supplement Table 1, available at Annals.org). In addition, we excluded children whose mothers had not lived in Denmark for at least 2 years before childbirth.

So they studied the kids who ...

1) survived past two years
2) were healthy at two years (no respiratory, immunicological, organ failure issues)
3) and, were not vaccinated toooo much

Ignore the sick babies, and the ones who didn't survive, and the ones that didn't get too vaccinated, and for that subgroup "small relative effects" were noted in the vaccination group. And that's a good thing?

I gave up reading the study and searched it instead for the phrase "control group" and found none. So ... comparing the sick to the sick and not finding dramatic differences in their sickness. Whatevs.

[so_real]

Ignore the sick babies, and the ones who didn't survive, and the ones that didn't get got too vaccinated,

Ooops.

[BikerJoe]

So they studied the kids who ...

1) survived past two years
2) were healthy at two years (no respiratory, immunicological, organ failure issues)
3) and, were not vaccinated toooo much

AND it sure seems like, most importantly, they DID NOT conduct a study with the same vaccines WITHOUT the aluminum, and compare those results to the vaccines that include it.

But, after all, this is SCIENCE!