Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Peter ODonnell

Occams Razor: The simplest answer is there are reasons for not disclosing everything about Epstein that override the “public’s right to know” (which at this point is moot because he’s dead), the most obvious being “national security”.


21 posted on 07/09/2025 9:07:42 AM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: bigbob

“The simplest answer is there are reasons for not disclosing everything about Epstein that override the “public’s right to know”

There is no need to endanger possible prosecution of crimes just to satisfy people’s prurient interests:

Prurient: having or encouraging an excessive or inappropriate interest in sexual matters, especially the sexual activities and intimate affairs of others.


43 posted on 07/09/2025 9:32:28 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The road is a dangerous place man, you can die out here...or worse. -Johnny Paycheck, 1980, Reno, NV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson