[dangus]

I don’t understand comments like yours. Were Jaguar’s sales declining before the ad? Yes. But when you say “it didn’t cause the decline” in the context of discussing a 97% sales collapse, it’s impossible to perceive that you’re talking about the slight decay of sales begun prior to the new campaign, and not a collapse marked by a major inflection point as the new campaign was released.

I’m a proponent of adding a corrective amount of nuance to a conversation, but your comments seem more like those of a flaming nonbinary ideologue trying to gaslight The View viewers into ignoring the news than someone trying to prevent overselling the case.

[Chainmail]

So what’s in common with both Bud Light and Jaguar? Homosexuals running their ad campaigns. How about “transsexuals” and sexualizing of our children? More homosexuals.

We have more and more examples happening all around us and we vastly underestimate the money, the connections, and the pervasiveness of homosexuals within our society.