Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

1:30 min clip @ Link

Some inside baseball for you with my favorite House member.

1 posted on 06/26/2025 2:31:29 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RandFan

mASSie would definitely know a thing or two about sucking.


2 posted on 06/26/2025 2:36:32 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Hope, as a righteous product of properly aligned Faith, IS in fact a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Massie is 110% correct

Omnibus bills are how Fed.gov, and Democrats, maintain and grow corruption and the deep-state.

Packing 10, 20 or even more items into one vote is to guarantee bloat and dysfunction


3 posted on 06/26/2025 2:46:48 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Not going to watch the video, but I’ve often thought that a better way to do things would be to start the fiscal year by passing a budget that is 90% of the previous year’s budget. Then they could spend the rest of the year haggling over the last 10%—more or less. That way, if they did it right, there would be less danger of a government shutdown, and the fiscal soundness or unsoundness of the remaining details might be more obvious.

I would even more prefer, during times like these, that there be no automatic spending increases, and the government decides on a simple 1% cut across the board. Families have to make such decisions during tough times. Their government should, too.


4 posted on 06/26/2025 2:49:18 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Not going to watch the video, but I’ve often thought that a better way to do things would be to start the fiscal year by passing a budget that is 90% of the previous year’s budget. Then they could spend the rest of the year haggling over the last 10%—more or less. That way, if they did it right, there would be less danger of a government shutdown, and the fiscal soundness or unsoundness of the remaining details might be more obvious.

I would even more prefer, during times like these, that there be no automatic spending increases, and the government decides on a simple 1% cut across the board. Families have to make such decisions during tough times. Their government should, too.


5 posted on 06/26/2025 2:49:18 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

I don’t know what I hate more—Ominbus bills or Omnibus bills.

Lol.


6 posted on 06/26/2025 2:51:04 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Absolutely correct. This dereliction of duty and responsibility in both House & Senate is disgraceful.

There’s no justification for not separating these Omnibus Bills into related components and voting on them separately. Except that both sides want their version on pork spending that won’t stand on its own merits.


7 posted on 06/26/2025 2:52:19 PM PDT by sjmjax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

I believe it was President Zachary Taylor who coined the term “omnibus bill,” for the measure that became the Compromise of 1850. Its critics likened it to an omnibus, a passenger-carrying wagon that was the forerunner to the modern bus. Taylor threatened to veto it, but his death precluded that.


12 posted on 06/26/2025 3:12:57 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Regular order appropriations bills, or shut it all down.


13 posted on 06/26/2025 3:14:21 PM PDT by blackdog ((Z28.310) Today's Democrat Party is nothing but very bad performance art. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Yet he voted for them before.


14 posted on 06/26/2025 3:16:14 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

I never got a bill for riding the omnibus. I either paid for the ticket, or had a monthly pass. I prefer to ride in the automobile.


17 posted on 06/26/2025 6:53:31 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

The last time Congress passed all 13 individual appropriations bills before the start of the fiscal year (October 1) was in 1994.


18 posted on 06/26/2025 7:54:55 PM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Every congress person including Massie is a purist in some sense - demanding laws that fit their demands exactly, which they can never get. So “horse trading” becomes the norm and horrible omnibus bills, more so than amendments that are really off topic, have become the way Congress gets enough horses in the same stable.

I would like to see “pure bills” that do one single narrow thing and nothing else. I think that would be the right way for legislation. I know that is a pipe dream today and nothing can force Congress to change exact Congressional rules changes that no Congress is going to enact.

Wake up Massie, face reality.


20 posted on 06/27/2025 5:40:53 AM PDT by Wuli (uire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson