Sorry- this is a long, overly written and poorly constructed narrative from the a@2holes at Politico- a RAG of a publication of completely owned derp state wannabees and hirelings.
There is NO division between Trump and Gabbard. The start of this crap was complete misquoting, done again in this posting, to which Gabbards reply re: March statement— was to say “it would help if the media would write what my statement actually was, instead of making up non existent sentences and positions. The President and I are on the same page.
FRiend, the CinC is NOT contemplating war— far from it. He is engineering policy and support for Israel’s needed actions. He is helping as a good ally. We are NOT- despite all the efforts of Bolton (the real warmonger) and that IDIOT Mike Pence to drag us into a theater war WHILE Trump is trying to negotiated the peace in the perpetual existing graft/grift war in Ukraine. This is the real threat to ALL of the trough eating useless dingleberrys who have profited for years off the Ukraine corrupt skim and money down a rat hole— making money off the skim with lots of mouths open (McConnell, Graham, and a host of Demonrat morons who continue to Zeep away and react to the grifted funds uncovered by DOGE, shut down and to be clawed back into general revenue by recission).
Honestly— William Jenning Bryan in 1917 bears no resemblance whatsoever to this situation. Israel is able to handle its own anti-Iran policies with the existing good support and zero involvement of US forces except aiding in the “eyes in the sky” and intel support. Absolutely silly comparison also as Trump is not, and never would be a Woodrow Wilson clown democrat. Never.
A. I’ve seen and heard the entire Gabbard clip. I don’t need Politico or the National Review to interpret it for me.
B. “FRiend, the CinC is NOT contemplating war— far from it.”
That’s simply not supported by the facts, by which I mean President Trump’s public comments and Truth Social posts.
“I don’t care what she [Gabbard] said. I think they [the Iranians] were very close to having a weapon.”
So, for the very greatest strategic issue facing us today, the one where the President relies on his DNI, he is trashing the one thing she’s responsible for.
He said there was no intention to kill Iran’s leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei “for now.” Who talks of possibly eliminating another country’s chief of state if not considering war?
In discussing the current state of hostilities, he said this: “We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn’t compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured ‘stuff.’ Nobody does it better than the good ol’ USA.”
He said WE have control of the skies, not Israel. Why would someone NOT considering war speaking of controlling the skies of a country we are NOT at war with or even weighing the possibility of war?