But it’s not about Fordow. It’s about regime change and UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER
Besides, according to publicly available information, even our biggest baddest bunker buster can’t go that deep and it would need a number of strikes to penetrate that far down, and even then ...
Bibi also needed our help right out of the gate because he bit off more than he could chew — Israel doesn’t have a sufficient number of tankers to keep his aircraft refueled and needed ours to help out there, as well as to help shoot down incoming drones and missiles. Now it looks like we are going to get even more involved.
Agree.
What might happen, and there are already slight signs, is China will send in troops with the understanding of regional security.
They’ll remove the supreme leader and have him taken away under a custody agreement and exiled.
China, Pakistan, Turkey, Qatar and a few others, India, are consumers of Iranian energy.
If China sends in peacekeeping troops, to protect their interests, then what does Israel do?
Russia, although it has a security agreement with Iran presently, is busy elsewhere. Their response in this conflict would be purely military if at all. But, they have that agreement.
So, they have already asked China to cover for them no doubt.
Aside from that, Russia is about to make a whole lot of money out of this debacle.
“But it’s not about Fordow. It’s about regime change and UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.”
Unconditional surrender is optimum outcome….or “the big ask”. Taking out Fordow what you do because you can’t not do it given Israel has acquired air superiority.
The eggs are broken, finish making the omelette.