“The answer is to freeze spending at current levels...”
************
No chance of that because buying votes requires ever increasing outlays. /sarc
“No chance of that because buying votes requires ever increasing outlays.“
That’s not sarcasm. Over half the population receives more money from FedGov than they put in.
Any congressman who votes for cuts will be replaced by someone who will increase spending.
Would that’s include freezing increases to the sacred monthly check?