Posted on 06/10/2025 9:25:52 PM PDT by Morgana
Your basic American woman...
lol I *am* the old timers. :-)
On alimony I agree. In fact I think it should be abolished.
Child support? No. You breed them, you feed them. The needs of your children come first. That applies to both parents.
That would be fairness but men get no fairness, only the backhand of the law...
Usually, it's a man delivering that backhand. I know from experience. I had a family member who had to deal with the family court system, and the only time he was treated with any degree of fairness was when the judge was a woman. The male judges fell all over themselves trying to find some angle that would allow them to side with the mother.
No. You like making strawman arguments. I said what I said. You need to learn to stop reading things in that haven’t been said. Its an (ass)umptive thing to do and most people don’t like others putting words in their mouths and shows you don’t really read or listen to what people say to you. And they won’t deal with you anymore because its pointless.
Actually men are doing something about it. They are no longer marrying, many aren’t even dating. They are deciding not to expose themselves to potential problems and unnecessary stress, lies that can destroy their lives, finan es, and kids, with family courts ready to oblige.
But tradcuck white knights will still have issues with men deciding these personal choices for themselves. It doesnt help any of the guys already screwed over or already in a marriage contract, but more guys are seeing what has happened to men they know and are deciding they aren’t going to let that happen to them.
You don’t understand your own words and logic.
Then women will have children without husbands. There's already enough sperm in the sperm banks to keep the human race going for the next 500 years (nice going, men). If women can't have babies with husbands, then they'll have them without husbands.
Running away won't fix this. It will only make things worse for men. They will be outbred, out-voted, and out of the picture. At some point, men will need to stand up for themselves and their sons.
But tradcuck white knights will still have issues with men deciding these personal choices for themselves.
That's very true.
Imdo, you’re an assumptive ass. I’ll make it clearer for you. Per Jim’s rule, please no longer communicste with me.
If you want and get custody of the child then you get child support for two years. If you can’t or won’t pay for your children, give them up to the father.
Having a child shouldn’t mean you get a monthly ATM account.
The whole child support system is just the state taking over more of our rights and inserting the government into personal relations for 20 years.
Don’t hate the messenger.
No, you breed them, you feed them.
If you believe someone who says they are for equality under the law, ie a constitutional republic where no one is above the law, and opposes hypocrisy/double standards, and then says because of that, that person then must also support the ERA, you’re either very stupid at best, or a lying gaslighter at worst.
But hey, don’t hate the messenger, slick.
Equality under the law of men and woman (you left out the man/woman part) was what the ERA was all about.
I’ve got nothing against you. I’m just responding to posts, not the poster per se.
I understand how people can see the double standards, unfairness and corruption in our system and society and have the reactions your exemplifying here.
I’m just trying to bring it back to a Biblical perspective.
The era was not about equality. It established law to make women have more rights than men, while claiming it was just making them equal. Its just like title ix. Title ix makes women a protected higher class because it forces schools to create and carve out sports for women regardless of whether anyone or the school or anyone there wants to play them, at the expense of men. Because they shut down some of the mens sports in order to redirect money towards the womens sports. Not a single mens sports team gets protected status the womens teams get.
The entire womens rights movement has been about establishing privilege, a superior position over men. They are favored in courts and play up the victimhood. They dont want equality, they want superiority. What that is today, we see by their actions. When equality works for them, they push for equality. When equality doesnt work for them and requires them being held responsible and accountablemfor their actions and choices, they no longer demand equality, but cry for exemptions, exceptions, and special treatment.
That is why I said I want equality under the law, because if we had it, the law would treat everyone the same, no double standards and hypocrisy, both men and women, not treating women as super citizens that get all the benefits of equality but also get special preferential treatment to duck and avoid responsibility and accountability because they’re just helpless wittle girls and patriarchy bad....
Maybe you kind of get what I mean better now. I’d be all for biblical law. The law didnt make a lot of distinction between men and women. Women would be put to death for the same crimes men would be. They didnt spare them or give them special treatment because they were women. Equality under the law is biblical. The 10 commandments didn’t have easier requirements for women. The consequences of breaking laws were not easier on them either.
Also proving the era wasn’t about equality of men and women, these w9men whowere so gung ho about equality, did nothing to also push for equality in areas where women traditionally outnumbered men. They never said there needed to be more male nurses. Or stop reducing the number of male schoolteachers and journalists and veterinarians. They never cared abkout inequality when it affected men negatively. The era never was about equality, and this showed it.
I didn’t say Biblical law.
I’ve always understood what you’re saying.
I point out Godly living which is the prophylactic and the antidote.
Well I agree but the real world conditions and people you deal with don’t do that. Thats why basing legal systems that treat everyone equally and not establishing classes of people who get better favorable unequal treatment under the law, is not good law. We don’t have equal treatment under the law when it comes to the sexes. Its incredibly biased against men and favoring women with privilged treatment and being a special class. Treating everyone the same under the law is the best form of law, thats how God treats everyone as well, no one gets special treatment from Him.
Hypothetical dialogue.
You fathered a child, you have to support him.
Why do I have to and not the woman?
Because you are the man.
Men who slept with whores did not “support” any children.
Prove its their kid. If shes sleeping around with one guy shes sleeping with more than one guy. Women today are whores sleeping around with multiple guys. They have body counts. They dont know who the father is.
Biblically, whores are not wives. They dont get the same rights and privileges. They are not treated the same.
You’ve gone off the rails.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.