Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2025 5:04:08 PM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Someone wrote a rebuttal. What more proof do we need?


2 posted on 06/09/2025 5:11:50 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Openurmind

The two sides of this argument are NOT mutually exclusive. I, myself, do believe and pray that the military is, indeed, using the UFOUAP “admissions” for a cover for advanced weaponry. And no, I do not think that the military is coming clean about anything. I do believe there is something to the UFOs that the military may or may not have managed to get new advances from.


7 posted on 06/09/2025 5:35:09 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Churchjack; eastforker; Levy78; maddog55; Jonty30; GingisK; Mark17; spirited irish; RoosterRedux; ..

UFO ping


14 posted on 06/10/2025 1:39:36 AM PDT by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Openurmind
An EMP device constructed outside the site? I would think it would require a tremendous amount of power to fire it. So what was the source of that power?

I believe Salas and thought his letter of rebuttal was very accurate.

15 posted on 06/10/2025 2:44:32 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Openurmind

I believe Robert Salas.


17 posted on 06/10/2025 6:17:59 AM PDT by NeverTyranny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson