To: Morgana
They must be labeling all pregnancies as Down syndrome babies to justify abortion.
2 posted on
06/02/2025 11:03:31 PM PDT by
mass55th
(“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
To: mass55th
Not to justify it.
But in order for them to perform the abortion, if its after 24 weeks.
3 posted on
06/02/2025 11:13:58 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: mass55th; SaveFerris; No name given
I think sometimes they are.
Or the doc is worried they might be sued so they are pressuring the parents to abort in case the child is disabled.
4 posted on
06/02/2025 11:14:09 PM PDT by
Morgana
( “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.” — Alice Paul 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 )
To: mass55th
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Scotland: Abortions for Down syndrome surge over 80% in 3 years, mass55th wrote: |
They must be labeling all pregnancies as Down syndrome babies to justify abortion. |
I think you're right. I was thinking the level of birth defects would have risen with vaxxed pregnant women and vaxxed infants. So call it down syndrome and then write an article portraying it as a Down syndrome epidemic.
6 posted on
06/02/2025 11:34:25 PM PDT by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: mass55th
Public Health Scotland published new abortion statistics last week, showing that abortions following a Down syndrome diagnosis or a disability diagnosis rose significantly from 2021-2024. Notably, there were 82% more abortions on children with Down syndrome in 2024 than in 2021.Abortions for babies who ALLEGEDLY had Down's Syndrome.
It's all based on a diagnosis from a less than accurate test.
10 posted on
06/03/2025 12:18:09 AM PDT by
metmom
( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson