Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd

“But what did it achieve at the operational and strategic levels? “

You should read up on asymmetric warfare. It’s tactics 101 for that.

The goal is to run operations at low cost to you that will force your opponent into high cost defensive postures. At the cost of a few trucks and drones Russia will need to divert resources from the front to protect scattered air bases across Russia.


26 posted on 06/02/2025 1:59:10 PM PDT by Renfrew (Muscovia delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Renfrew

Yes, I know about asymmetric warfare. And have known from the beginning of this war that Ukraine, being weaker, would have to rely on it.

The incursion into Kursk was supposed to divert Russian troops from the front lines. Only it didn’t. Oops.

Now the Russians may well erect nets around their airfields similar to the ones they are using to protect their logistics routes. Some nets. Big diversion. Big whoop.


27 posted on 06/02/2025 2:12:47 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "all's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson