Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Has It Backwards...IMHO

Posted on 05/30/2025 8:49:11 AM PDT by TheOldSchool

I am not a lawyer however it seems Trump is doing things in reverse. Every time Trump issues an Executive Order, an activist judge rules it illegal. Why can't he do some "judge shopping" and get a ruling from a judge saying the EO is legal, then issue his/her ruling, and bingo, he is in line with the judicial system and then execute his EO.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: judgeslegaltrump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


21 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:45 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


22 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:47 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


23 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:49 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


24 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:50 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


25 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:51 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


26 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:52 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


27 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:53 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


28 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:53 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


29 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:53 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar

So the Trump admin would issue an so then sue itself before a friendly judge and het a friendly ruling before the dems could go to work


30 posted on 05/30/2025 8:58:56 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Nothing like a good Stephen Miller jolt!


31 posted on 05/30/2025 8:59:13 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Thanks for the Legal Education! Oh well, I thought it was an idea. Once again, thanks everyone.


32 posted on 05/30/2025 8:59:22 AM PDT by TheOldSchool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

By doing what you suggest, Trump would be saying that his EO is illegal and he is acting illegally. Then he would be asking the judge to confirm or deny legality. That’s not how it works and it is not a good idea. Trump should, and has, start from the point the the EO is legal and he is acting in accordance with the law, his executive powers.


33 posted on 05/30/2025 9:00:11 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

By doing what you suggest, Trump would be saying that his EO is illegal and he is acting illegally. Then he would be asking the judge to confirm or deny legality. That’s not how it works and it is not a good idea. Trump should, and has, start from the point the the EO is legal and he is acting in accordance with the law, his executive powers.


34 posted on 05/30/2025 9:00:13 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

By doing what you suggest, Trump would be saying that his EO is illegal and he is acting illegally. Then he would be asking the judge to confirm or deny legality. That’s not how it works and it is not a good idea. Trump should, and has, start from the point the the EO is legal and he is acting in accordance with the law, his executive powers.


35 posted on 05/30/2025 9:00:15 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

By doing what you suggest, Trump would be saying that his EO is illegal and he is acting illegally. Then he would be asking the judge to confirm or deny legality. That’s not how it works and it is not a good idea. Trump should, and has, start from the point the the EO is legal and he is acting in accordance with the law, his executive powers.


36 posted on 05/30/2025 9:00:18 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

By doing what you suggest, Trump would be saying that his EO is illegal and he is acting illegally. Then he would be asking the judge to confirm or deny legality. That’s not how it works and it is not a good idea. Trump should, and has, start from the point the the EO is legal and he is acting in accordance with the law, his executive powers.


37 posted on 05/30/2025 9:00:20 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Hijack the thread much?


38 posted on 05/30/2025 9:01:24 AM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO!! The end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

Huh? People should contact all the cops before they go out and exceed the speed limit.


39 posted on 05/30/2025 9:01:41 AM PDT by Cobra64 (ECommon sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOldSchool

I asked Zen Master this. An affirmative ruling will not negate a negative (”you can’t do that”) ruling. It will only prompt an appeal. (two equal judges).

Trump is doing the right thing by NOT ignoring the judges. He is winning over 90% of these cases when they reach the final determination. He’s going to win almost all of them.

Meanwhile, public support for ignoring judges is only about 21%


40 posted on 05/30/2025 9:11:26 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." Jimi Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson