[ConservativeMind]

45% less radiation and a higher survival rate against prostate cancer.

Seems a “win” to me.

[ConservativeMind]

The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.

Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.

[Jane Long]

So many success stories on this (and, other) cancer with the use of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole.

Radiation? Or, safe and effective drugs.

I pray folks begin to wake up.

[ro_dreaming]

My father in law had prostate cancer, and had the pellets inserted at the VA clinic in Atlanta. It eliminated the prostate cancer, but caused some other issues (I mean, he was in his 80’s, so yeah, there’s a LOT of other issues anyway).

[Robert357]

bump for reference

[CA_soon_gone]

I'm 20 years out after Cyberknife treatment. I don't understand why this protocol (proton) is still around. Multiple weeks of blasting the entire area vs 4 days of precision treatment (Cyberknife). One of my take aways in researching what treatment to use was that every doctor/facility has a very large investment in both money and education in one of several choices. Now not every choice is correct for every situation but in general surgeons want to cut, radiation clinics want to use the machines they have, brachytherapy experts want to do their thing. My doctor was a brachytherapy expert. World class guy. The hospital had just purchased the Cyberknife system. He was not eager to use it but six months later he told me the ones that did had far fewer side effects than his other patients.

At the time (20 yrs ago) proton had a poor success rate, was totally disruptive to your life for weeks, and had a lot of side effects. The described protocol sounds like an improvement but there are other choices.