“So Letitia James hadn’t entered law school at the time, yet was a licensed attorney and public official for purposes of making her look even worse than she is. Playing this sort of anachronism game undermines the author’s credibility.”
The sentences you quote are in different sections of the article.
According to public information, James received her J.D. in 1987 and was admitted to practice in NY in 1989. When she purchased the property with her father listed as her husband in 1983, she had not yet completed law school.
At the time she filed for letters of administration, she HAD completed law school. It’s strange that she waited over 10 years to start the probate of his estate and did not hire an estate lawyer to do so.
From the article:
“Though Robert James died in 1986, it wasn’t until 1999 that Letitia James filed for letters of administration over his estate. The Inwood Street house she purchased with her father was listed as the only asset.”
“The sentences you quote are in different sections of the article.”
It is possible the poster rearranged the article, but what I quoted is literally the first five lines of the article as posted in FR.
I’m curious on whether how old L. James’ father was at the time of his death, and in 1999 when she filed to be the administrvtor of his estate. Was some social security fraud, voting fraud, etc. going on here? Hmm...