Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/30/2025 8:25:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

No wonder no one can bring spending under control.


2 posted on 04/30/2025 8:25:55 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Back in the Cold War days of the black programs there were employees who used the secrecy of their security clearance to get away with murder.

They had cases where people literally went into their offices , closed the door and did nothing at all for years on end.

The only reason they were discovered was because the Cold War ended.

3 posted on 04/30/2025 8:32:11 AM PDT by rdcbn1 (TV )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
I tend to oversimplify, but ---

What if there was a rule that for every dollar an agency spent that was lost, misdirected, spent secretly without knowledge or agreement with the taxpayer ---

--- For every dollar stolen, a dollar was taken from the agency's budget?

What? $100M unaccounted for? That means you get $100M less money next year...

I know it ain't that easy, but you get the idea.

7 posted on 04/30/2025 8:58:20 AM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I assumed there was one or more back channel finance shenanigans in place besides USAID. Seems obvious since democrats were screaming and attacking DOGE and the dismantling of USAID. They protested too much as their latest distraction technique.

What I want to know that is missing from the article is, who are these “proponents of SFFAS?”


11 posted on 04/30/2025 9:24:21 AM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

And as usual Congress does nothing


12 posted on 04/30/2025 9:32:55 AM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

No wonder DOGE can’t get to finding $1 TRILLION+ in waste, fraud and abuse...


13 posted on 04/30/2025 9:40:13 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

It’s not secret any longer apparently.

The fools really think they can hide stuff from Elon’s tech geniuses?


15 posted on 04/30/2025 9:43:57 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
"If secrecy is to be justified, it must be rare, tightly controlled, and explicitly authorized by the people’s elected representatives."

How about setting up select committees in Congress that are told the whole unvarnished truth? Then they can figure out if national security would truly be threatened or compromised by releasing the financial information. Congress is not the most trustworthy organization, but at least there would be SOME outside eyeballs on the expenditures.

I wonder how much money is surreptitiously spent this way. Billions? Hundreds of billions? More?

16 posted on 04/30/2025 9:45:21 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Diversity is our Strength” just doesn’t carry the same message as “Death from Above”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

It starts with the intentional increase in size and increase in complexity of federal agencies, into which has been added both Congressional and Executive decisions as to what constitutes an expenditure a “national security” related, and with very opague detail of that from Congress and intentional obscurity given it by the Executive branch.

In pretending that so much Is “national security” related, they are pretending it is all protecting the people by keeping the information out of foreign exposure, when in fact it is also to keep the American people in the dark for the purpose of protecting federal agencies against the public protest of their activtities.


17 posted on 04/30/2025 9:47:29 AM PDT by Wuli (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Greg Hunter at USAWatchdog.com has ben covering SFFAS 56 from the beginning.


18 posted on 04/30/2025 10:04:37 AM PDT by johnnygeneric (Blocked website)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

God Bless Elon Musk and his brave teams... may God watch over them, protect them, and give them the thanks of the people ...


22 posted on 04/30/2025 11:02:36 AM PDT by GOPJ (Judicial robes aren't invisibility cloaks that allows judges to engage in criminal acts. J Turley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Some agencies even hide their employee paychecks under other civilian department agencies.


24 posted on 04/30/2025 11:10:25 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Under SFFAS 56, agencies may alter financial reports by removing, aggregating, or fabricating information, provided these adjustments do not “materially” affect the reported net results.

Biden had a double meaning WHERE’S THE MONEY?

SFFAS 56 opens the doors to many things good and bad now what?.


25 posted on 04/30/2025 11:39:44 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson