Trolling is a fetish that’s become quite the problem here, both in posting and comments. It’s a shame the mods ignore it.
However, I can’t label this FReeper a troll, thrice removed from the likes of the zeepers and jab acolytes. Rather, I’ve argued persistently that FR needs a category ‘propaganda surveillance’ under which I’d classify this post (which I would have tagged it, if not for the 20-character limit; ‘propaganda’ will have to suffice).
I’ve done so myself, with the cited term nested within [brackets] at the end of the headline, usually followed by obligatory derisive commentary under #1 (which many FReepers decline for whatever reason).
It’s certainly no pleasure to read of such nonsense, but it’s important to keep tabs on the efforts of the enemy, and clearly they’re still hard at work - e.g., the OP - patiently awaiting the next dem administration because Republicans have no cojones to lay waste to the fraudulent movement (or anything else for that matter).
the issue is that he creates countless posts about climate nonsense and then doesnt even bother to comment on it or address the countless comments on the nonsense articles and that is what is suspicious about the motives.
he comments on other stuff. no he is not a troll but the constant climate posts he spends the time to create and ghosts leave room for suspicion.
FR is in major need of an overhaul to remain relevant
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4312906/posts?page=21#21