Not enough details to figure out why his bets weren’t honored. There’s no way to know who’s right and wrong here.
I figure he got ripped off by the casino.
That’s why I’m laughing at him. He gambled.
Ha ha.
“Not enough details to figure out why his bets weren’t honored.”
Not in this article but there are dudes that look for errors in odds payoff calls and only bet those.
Money-laundering. What he did was post several small bets rather than a single big one (those “hours upon hours” making bets at a kiosk). So he made a hundred $100 bets instead of a single $10,000 (numbers used for the sake of argument). Some casinos have rules against this because it can be used to launder money.
To me, he should have checked the rules first before going that route. But the casino should have also had security in place to catch the betting before it was made. I’m on the gambler’s side simply because the casino took the wagers, peiod.
FYI, got the details from The Sun. Yeah. I know. But it was also the onlty thing anyone siad that made sense. lol
Sure there is. They are in the business of taking bets. They took his bets. He won. They should pay.